Rust Future ecosystem
2022-01-25

The Rust future ecosystem is quite complex and in this post I hope to explore and shed light on the different pieces.

Note: the Futures ecosystem is still evolving and will likely change as the Rust community agrees on best practices. It is therefore best to consider this post as a snapshot in time.

Why I think the ecosystem is so complicated:

Different future crates

futures-rs

futures-rs is a project before there were futures in Rust. The goal of the project was to experiment with futures before officially supporting it in the Rust standard library. The project was a success and from it came the Future trait. The trait is what allowed the rust team to then build an deliver the async feature that the community very much wanted for the 2018 edition.

However, there is still so much more functionality that is part of the futures-rs project and alot is already being used. The futures crate is the entire collection of all functionality exposed by futures-rs while the futures-* is the project broken into smaller modular pieces.

So what does futures-rs offer? Stream, Channels, IO, task, and helpers to make it more convenient to work with futures!

std future

The standard future crate (which is part of the Rust standard library) offers the Future trait. This trait is what allows the Rust community to write interopable code.

task module

While not actually a future, this module contains some core concepts necessary for writing asynchronous programs.

We need a runtime to actually make progress in a program. There are many types of runtimes, but lets consider the tokio runtime. Rather than spawn threads, tokio, utilizes green threads or tasks to complete work. So within a single thread a task might run until it makes an async non-blocking call (file read, network send, timeout, etc.).

The non-blocking is important because it allows the runtime to utilize the thread to run another task instead (ie. the network call is waiting for some packets to arrive and doesnt actually need cpu resources). This cooperative non-blocking scheduling by the executor allows for much denser workloads to occur compared to the thread per task model.

In this cooperative scheduling, a task (as it is known in tokio) is the unit of work (rather than a thread). A task should contains all the information to start, make progress and finish the work. Being asynchronous, a task expects Future, which it can start, and then poll() to completion.